Skip to content


  • Add this article to your LinkedIn page
  • Add this article to your Twitter feed
  • Add this article to your Facebook page
  • Email this article
  • View or print a PDF of this page
  • Share further
  • Add this article to your Pinterest board
  • Add this article to your Google page
  • Share this article on Reddit
  • Share this article on StumbleUpon
  • Bookmark this page

The growing risk


Kate O'Flaherty

SC Magazine

2 May 2014


PA’s Mark Stollery, cyber security expert, is quoted in an article on large-scale cyber espionage and how the methods behind it are becoming more complex and sophisticated.

Mark explains that one of the problems – and benefits – of state-sponsored attacks is that they are deniable, “at least to the extent that it’s unlikely to start a fighting war.”

He goes on to say: “If there’s a cyber attach and you are pretty sure it is country X but you can’t prove it, it keeps the hard warfare tensions down.”

Mark explains that there are many allegations regarding the perpetrator behind Stuxnet. “Iran may feel certain that it knows who was behind it. If the attack had been done by war planes or special forces, it would ratchet up the international tensions so much more.”

Mark goes on to say that if someone attacks you, you feel you out to be retaliating. He explains: “That’s what you expect, but you don’t want a slippery slope that leads to war. That gives you the diplomatic doubt. It’s far easier to fire some malware shells at your neighbour. They probably know it’s you, but they don’t feel obliged to retaliate.”


By using this website, you accept the use of cookies. For more information on how to manage cookies, please read our privacy policy.