Skip to content


  • Add this article to your LinkedIn page
  • Add this article to your Twitter feed
  • Add this article to your Facebook page
  • Email this article
  • View or print a PDF of this page
  • Share further
  • Add this article to your Pinterest board
  • Add this article to your Google page
  • Share this article on Reddit
  • Share this article on StumbleUpon
  • Bookmark this page

Should CEOs vent anger in public?

Financial Times

5 October 2011



The Financial Times asked Graham Lloyd the question: "Last month, Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan, lambasted Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of Canada, arguing that he was wrong to support new banking regulations that he claimed were ill thought out. European bankers, by contrast, have tended to make their concerns known more quietly. Which approach is best when trying to get regulators to change their view?


The consultant: PA Consulting Group

The real issue is whether there is an effective forum for debate and a transparent process for decision-making. All parties should be engaged, regardless of partisanship – that can be filtered out later. Scrutinising any market framework to ensure it is economic and practical feels like a reasonable step and those setting the rules are more likely to play by them.

Applying these principles visibly from the outset ensures the right debate.

To visit PA's financial services page, please click here.

To find out how PA can help your organisation to be fit for the future, please click here or contact us now.

Contact the financial services team

By using this website, you accept the use of cookies. For more information on how to manage cookies, please read our privacy policy.