Skip to content


  • Add this article to your LinkedIn page
  • Add this article to your Twitter feed
  • Add this article to your Facebook page
  • Email this article
  • View or print a PDF of this page
  • Share further
  • Add this article to your Pinterest board
  • Add this article to your Google page
  • Share this article on Reddit
  • Share this article on StumbleUpon
  • Bookmark this page

Is it disloyal to be ambitious for the top job in public?


Stephen Brooks

Financial Times

4 September 2013



Last week Carlos Tavares stepped down as chief operating officer at Renault after saying in an interview that he was looking to become CEO at another carmaker. Mr Tavares said he was not being disloyal, but merely displaying his ambition. Is it possible to be frank in public without undermining your position at the company where you work? 


Carlos Tavares has every right to decide whether to wait for the opportunity to become CEO at Renault or seek an opportunity elsewhere. But he was wrong to announce his intentions in such a public manner. He must have known it would fatally undermine his own position. How could he expect the board to trust him after announcing to the world that he wanted to work with a competitor?

It would have been far better to discuss his intentions only with Renault. Then, if he did leave, his departure could have been handled in such a way as to restrict damage to his reputation and that of the company. But then, for all we know, he may already have done that.

Stephen Brooks is a specialist in people management at PA Consulting Group


To find about more about how PA can help your organisation to achieve excellence in people management, click here or contact us now.

Contact the people and talent team

By using this website, you accept the use of cookies. For more information on how to manage cookies, please read our privacy policy.