Skip to content

Share

  • Add this article to your LinkedIn page
  • Add this article to your Twitter feed
  • Add this article to your Facebook page
  • Email this article
  • View or print a PDF of this page
  • Share further
  • Add this article to your Pinterest board
  • Add this article to your Google page
  • Share this article on Reddit
  • Share this article on StumbleUpon
  • Bookmark this page
PA IN THE MEDIA

It is unlikely that any single FTT will work for all products

 

    

Financial Times  

31 May 2013

 

Letter to the editor

Sir, Avinash Persaud is right to point out that arguments used by opponents of the proposed financial transaction tax are in places contradictory or disproportionate (“Europe should embrace a financial transaction tax”, May 29). However, he fails to provide a compelling reason why this particular FTT should be embraced.

The biggest weakness in his argument is that he fails to consider the structure of the tax in respect of the many different asset classes to which it would be applied. Instead, he bases his discussion of completely different markets largely on equities.

Apart from the potential impact of these proposals on the repo markets, applying a 0.01 per cent tax to derivatives trades, levied on notional value, makes little sense as the basis for a tax.

It is, of course, by no means impossible to levy taxes on financial markets transactions, as in the case of UK stamp duty, nor is it necessarily a bad idea. However, these proposals are misconceived, and it is unlikely that any single model will work for such different products.

  


 

Contact the financial services team

By using this website, you accept the use of cookies. For more information on how to manage cookies, please read our privacy policy. 

×