• Phone
  • Contact us
  • Locations
  • Search
  • Menu

share

  • Add this article to your LinkedIn page
  • Add this article to your Twitter feed
  • Email this article
View or print a PDF of this page
.

It is unlikely that any single FTT will work for all products

Financial Times  

31 May 2013

 

Letter to the editor

Sir, Avinash Persaud is right to point out that arguments used by opponents of the proposed financial transaction tax are in places contradictory or disproportionate (“Europe should embrace a financial transaction tax”, May 29). However, he fails to provide a compelling reason why this particular FTT should be embraced.

The biggest weakness in his argument is that he fails to consider the structure of the tax in respect of the many different asset classes to which it would be applied. Instead, he bases his discussion of completely different markets largely on equities.

Apart from the potential impact of these proposals on the repo markets, applying a 0.01 per cent tax to derivatives trades, levied on notional value, makes little sense as the basis for a tax.

It is, of course, by no means impossible to levy taxes on financial markets transactions, as in the case of UK stamp duty, nor is it necessarily a bad idea. However, these proposals are misconceived, and it is unlikely that any single model will work for such different products.

  


 

For more information on regulation, click here


   
Corporate headquarters
123 Buckingham Palace Road
London SW1W 9SR London SW1W 9SR
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7333 5865 Tel: +44 20 7333 5865
contact us now

NEWS UPDATES

Sign-up to receive company updates and press releases by email or newsfeed:

SIGN-UP

 

By using this website, you accept the use of cookies. For more information on how to manage cookies, please read our privacy policy.

×